The Crowd SAFE and most other crowdfunding securities used in Regulation Crowdfunding from 2016-2020 are worse for both founders and investors than SPVs.
From the standpoint of founders, the Crowd SAFE is not one line on your cap table:
- With a Crowd SAFE, you could choose to aggregate all investors in one line on Carta. However, you are in charge of keeping track of this spreadsheet of who your investors are. That spreadsheet can be called a cap table. This is massively simplified for you with an SPV.
- With a Crowd SAFE, all of your investors - even if they have not converted their SAFE to own equity - still count towards the 12(g) threshold. This means if you have more than 500 unaccredited investors and more than $25 million in assets, you are subject to SEC public company disclosure and reporting obligations. With an SPV, there is no limit to the amount of unaccredited investors you can have.
- With a Crowd SAFE, you are only postponing the problem of getting signatures from every single investor. One day, you might want to take an acquisition offer. The lawyers - in order to prevent your investors suing you for of a breach of fiduciary duty - will ask you to get a signature from all of your SAFE-holders, even if they don't have equity. With an SPV, you only need one signature, your Lead's.
- With a Crowd SAFE, there is no concept of a Lead Investor who is financially incentivized to help you. With an SPV, your Lead Investor - who you choose - is incentivized to help your company succeed.
- With a Crowd SAFE, you will raise less money, because experienced and larger-dollar investors will not accept the Crowd SAFE terms. With an SPV, you can use an investment contract that professional investors use - such as the Y Combinator SAFE.